[penguicon-general] Reported website issue (from yesterdays meeting)

[Jer]

I'm sorry, I replied to the wrong email.

I hadn't considered pulling just on an occasional basis (rather than every
single page load)... the idea has a lot of merit... and if it's done often
enough it will still be very up-to-date information. There's no reason it
can't be done.

-jer

On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Clay Dowling <clay at lazarusid.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 12:10 -0500, Jer wrote:
> > They expressly approve of pulling down from the site directly. Were I
> > to guess, it is the methodology with which its being done... I've been
> > having no such problems with mine, nor has the various other sites
> > I've seen that pull the journal to their content.
>
> This is definitely nice of them to allow us to pull directly like that,
> and I'm glad we weren't violating any terms of use.  I was just looking
> at it as a matter of bypassing what seemed to be a performance
> bottleneck.
>
> Clay
>
> _______________________________________________
> penguicon-general mailing list
> penguicon-general at penguicon.org
> http://penguicon.org/mailman/listinfo/penguicon-general
>



-- 
-jer
jer.lance at gmail.com
http://www.ibloviate.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://penguicon.org/pipermail/penguicon-general/attachments/20080309/26412c53/attachment.htm